With the development of a culture that aims to raise awareness of the economic and environmental benefits of recycling and waste recycling, it is almost an obligation to address the issue of legislation and the critical application of the same premises. Criticality citizens living sarrocchesi unfortunately for some time now. In order to make a useful analysis to understand the complexity of the subject will present an example of a common member of ' Community Association Virtuosi "and an analysis of the cost of moving from the TARSU that of" lowest price ".
The City will take that as an example is Berlingo, where the junta government has regulated a particular implementation of the legislation on TARSU. This year, in fact, Berlingo will come into force a new system for calculating the TARSU. This innovative system is based on a "fixed fee" that will take into account the area of \u200b\u200bhousing, and a "variable fee" calculated on the emptying of the container of unsorted municipal waste.
The "variable fee" is structured as follows: to each family, in a progressive manner based on the number of members of the family is guaranteed a predetermined amount of "emptying the container indifferentiation" which if exceeded results in an increase in calculating the fee for the following year. The "variable fee" calculated on the emptying of the container, in addition to introducing a more equitable mechanism that rewards those who produce less waste, is also a great incentive "education" which aims to raise awareness to a greater focus on differentiating their waste. Basically, the more diverse and less chances you have to overcome the established quota of "emptying allowed for the undifferentiated". A system that, by encouraging the reduction of unrecycled, will tend to reduce the overall cost of disposal.
The implementation of municipal regulations TARSU Berlingo applied to comply with the law but at the same time favor the reduction of the production of undifferentiated and, in calculating the amount, are more equitable, taking into account the actual quantity of waste produced.
course as implemented Berlingo is not perfection but an example of how, with a little ingenuity and administrative capacity, it is possible to address and resolve some problems and inequities by not entrench their shortcomings with the traditional justification, very common in Sarroch of "state law provides."
Fortunately, even the state legislature has already provided for the gradual overcoming of TARSU and its replacement by the more objective and efficient system centered on price. Ronchi Decree (d.lgs.22/97 , art.49) and its implementing regulations (DPR 158/99) governing fact the "TIA" or "rate of environmental health" instead of TARSU (municipal solid waste tax).
The rate is divided into two parts, a fixed part (divided according to fixed parameters), to cover the operating costs (cleaning of roads, investment in structures, etc.) and a variable part that depends instead on the user-generated waste. Determination of the variable part is more complex and there are several methods:
1) fee on time. It 's the ideal method, capable of perfection and maximum system efficiency because the waste is to weigh accurately.
2) rate volume. It 's the only method that requires taking into account the "volume" of waste, estimated by the number of bags collected.
3) method presumptive . It 's the easiest to apply, but also less effective than the TARSU and discontinuous. is to determine the allocation between users according to the different coefficients for each user category by multiplying the area occupied.
4) indirect method . It 's a combination of timely and presumptive and is to weigh the amount of different types of waste generated in a certain area and then divide them among all users of that area under normal presumptive systems.
Da as shown by exposure of the TIA, it allows the local administrator a broad "range" of options in order to apply a tariff that does not actually allow more of the iniquities TARSU that ignores the most important value in defining the actual amount of waste that is the number of members of a family. And ' easy to understand that systems based on "rate on time" or "volumetric rate" would not allow situations where a pair of two people who live in a house of 100 square meters pay more for a family of six who lives in a building 50 square meters. Such inequities are even more pronounced in a country like Sarroch, where the cost of housing is lower than the market average and is therefore even more impractical to the nearest "big house portfolio equal the same great big fee." ; Not to mention the numerous cases of elderly people living alone in retirement, but dwelling in large houses, are forced to shell out up to 700 € when in fact, for the actual amount of waste should pay much less.
What would make the town council was to work for the transition from the TIA TARSU groped or at least, as happened in the town of Berlingo to minimize some critics of the legislation TARSU. Unfortunately, this has not happened and, as is generally the case currently with the junta PD, the direction taken was actually worsened the previous status quo with doubling the fee for all traders who are already in trouble for the delicate economic situation.
spaces for the transition from the TIA there were TARSU . In the first phase was expected that almost all municipalities would have had to pass by December 2006, but the finance laws of 2007 and 2008 blocked the terms decreeing that the municipalities would have to maintain until the end of 2009, the same system of taxation in 2006. However, meanwhile, intervened to override the TIA, the so-called D.lgs.152/2006 ( Decree of the environment), but now there is still the implementing regulation. Steps have been suspended just waiting for this decree that will allow municipalities to adopt under the new provisions of the TIA Environmental Code. This, however, did not prevent the Town Council of Sarroch perform the transition to the TIA in 2010. In fact, the last term from which the Communists would have had opportunity to take the TIA in accordance with the "old" regulations, in the absence of the implementing decree law on the last done so, had been extended until 30 June 2010 ( DL 194/09).
The "waste dossier" on Sarroch sheet, and inevitably proves how imperative a handover from a conservative mentality and an alternative to inefficient and discontinuity. You could do much to improve the current condition for lowering the amount and make it less unjust but nothing was done. TARSU Apply otherwise the legislation, focus on the transition to the rate, speed up the completion of the diversified even in losing 'and Sali Porto Columbu are some of the solutions. The next city administration will work hard in this area to address the legacy of this Government. The transition to the TIA, the ecological islands, are all elements of the proposal that be evaluated to try to ensure a new system that decreases the undifferentiated and therefore the amount for the user. Another challenge that must be addressed for the good of the community.
0 comments:
Post a Comment